![\"\u00d6GON-GUDINNA](\"http:\/\/mmstudies.com\/pas\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2021\/03\/OGON-GUDINNA-a-1.jpeg\" "\\"\u00d6GON-GUDINNA")
\n\tKonstverk av en seende Issa efter starroperationen<\/p>\n
Sammanst\u00e4llning och inledning av Gunilla Madeg\u00e5rd<\/a><\/p>\n\t NUTIDA INTERNATIONELL FORSKNING SOM ENH\u00c4LLIGT F\u00d6RKASTAR PA(S)-KONCEPTET SOM OVETENSKAPLIGT<\/p>\n <\/p>\n PA(S) – Ett gift som ger upphov till h\u00e4xprocesser<\/a> i modern tid\u00a0<\/p>\n Medan \u00a0nutida forskare, advokarer och \u00f6vriga professionellt verksamma<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0h\u00e4r i landet vinnl\u00e4gger sig om att ge legitimitet \u00e5t PA(S) har det i resten av v\u00e4stv\u00e4rlden bedrivits forskning som entydigt kan vederl\u00e4gga dess vetenskapliga giltighet.<\/p>\n Detta till trots av att det \u00a0redan en g\u00e5ng 2006 gjorts med besked av J.D. Jennifer Hoult i USA. S\u00e5 fr\u00e5gan \u00e4r varf\u00f6r samma sak ska beh\u00f6va bekr\u00e4ftas om och om igen.<\/p>\n (Ung: Det ber\u00e4ttigade i anspr\u00e5ken p\u00e5 vetenskaplig, \u00a0juridisk och politisk legitimitet hos PAS.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Sl\u00f6seri med forskarnas vedrm\u00f6dor<\/strong><\/p>\n Det m\u00e5ste definieras som oacceptabelt att h\u00f6gkvalificerade forskare tvingas l\u00e4gga ner tid och resurser p\u00e5 att om och om igen p\u00e5visa att skadlig vidskeplighet inte \u00e4r vetenskap.<\/p>\n En massiv kropp av gedigen forskning har i USA och UK delvis p\u00e5 grundval av Michel P Johnsons typologi av Domestic Violence<\/a> f\u00e5tt ett stort uppsving under de senaste decennierna. Den har p\u00e5 ett oveders\u00e4gligt\u00a0s\u00e4tt kunnat\u00a0 visa att den PA(S)-relaterade trend som i skydd av att utge sig f\u00f6r att vara allm\u00e4nvetskap d\u00e4remot vuxit sig allt starkare i Sverige, fungerar lika kontraproduktivt mot barns grundl\u00e4ggande behov av r\u00e4ttsskydd som mot det man f\u00f6rbundit sig till genom raticifieringen av Istanbulkonventionen i form av att minska p\u00e5 v\u00e5ldet mot kvinnor och barn\u00a0och de gigantiska kostnader som det \u00e5sankar samh\u00e4llet.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n COERCIVE CONTROL * NARCISSISTIC ABUSE * FAMILY COURT<\/p>\n October 1, 2020<\/p>\n What happens when a parent raises claims of ’abuse’ in a civil family court action and it gets counterclaimed with ’parental alienation’?\u00a0<\/p>\n Here’s what the experts say:<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n USA\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n U.S. child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: what do the data show? : <\/b>Professor Joan Meier (George Washington University)<\/p>\n ”The findings confirm that mothers’ claims of abuse, especially child physical or sexual abuse, increase their risk of losing custody, and that fathers’ cross-claims of alienation virtually double that risk. Alienation’s impact is gender-specific; fathers alleging mothers are abusive are not similarly undermined when mothers cross-claim alienation.”<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n ENGLAND\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n A Genealogy of Hostility: parental alienation in England and Wales : <\/b>Dr Adrienne Barnett (Brunel University London)\u00a0<\/p>\n ”The case law revealed a high incidence of domestic abuse perpetrated by parents (principally fathers) who were claiming that the resident parents (principally mothers) had alienated the children against them, which raises questions about the purpose of PA. More recently, a PA ’industry’ appears to have amassed comprising experts, therapists and lawyers, advocating transfers of children’s care from ’alienating’ mothers to non-resident fathers, as well as PA therapy for children and parents.”\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n SCOTLAND\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Manipulation and domestic abuse in contested contact – threats to children’s participation rights:<\/b> Dr F. Morrison, Professor K. Tisdall & Professor J. Callaghan (The University of Edinburgh)<\/p>\n ”While ’resist and refusal dynamics’ have yet to become mainstream terms in Scottish family law, ’manipulation’ has become a common concern in cases of contested contact. Drawing on a Scottish empirical study on contested child contact in circumstances of domestic abuse, we interrogate the implications that the concept of manipulation has for children’s participation rights. The study involved separate in-depth interviews with 18 children and their 16 mothers. Findings point to concerns about upholding children’s participation rights, particularly in cases where children were depicted as ”influenced” or ”manipulated”.<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n WALES<\/strong><\/p>\n Professional responses to ’parental alienation’: research-informed practice : <\/b>Dr Julie Doughty, Dr Nina Maxwell & Dr Tom Slater (Cardiff University)<\/p>\n ”This review revealed a dearth of reliable evidence on the concept of parental alienation, its prevalence, effects and measures for intervention.”<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n \u00a0FRANCE<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n How Is Parental Alienation used Against Separated and Divorced Mothers in France? : <\/b>Pierre-Guillaume Prigent (University of Western Brittany) & Gwenola Sueur (University of Angers)<\/p>\n ”Parental alienation is used as a strategy to conceal male violence, by violent men themselves, relatives or institutions, mainly. It reduces domestic violence to parental conflict and pathologizes women and children. This is linked to a wider problem of identification of domestic violence in France (mainly psychoanalysis based), and a tendency to undermine the credibility of abused mothers and their children.”<\/i><\/p>\n French\/English (First results recap)<\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n \u00c0 qui profite la pseudo th\u00e9orie de l’ali\u00e9nation parentale? <\/b>: Pierre-Guillaume Prigent & Gwenola Sueur<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n AUSTRALIA<\/strong><\/p>\n A history of the use of the concept of parental alienation in the Australian family law system: contradictions, collisions and their consequences : <\/b>Zoe Rathus AM (Griffith University)<\/p>\n \u00a0”When mothers’ allegations of violence in the family are disbelieved, minimised or dismissed, they are transformed from victims of abuse into perpetrators of abuse – alienators of children from their fathers. Their actions and attitudes collide with the shared parenting philosophy.”<\/i><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n CANADA<\/strong><\/p>\n The legitimization and institutionalization of ’parental alienation’ in the Province of Quebec : <\/b>Professor Simon Lapierre, Professor Patrick Ladouceur, Michele Frenette (University of Ottawa) & Assistant Professor Isabelle Cote (Laurentian University)<\/p>\n ”The findings reveal researchers’ and experts’ tendency to distance themselves from Gardner’s controversial work on ’parental alienation syndrome’ and to address the critiques by proposing new approaches and new concepts. However, the terms ’parental alienation syndrome’, ’parental alienation’ and ’alienating behaviours’ are often used interchangeably, and assessment practices tend to rely on similar indicators.”<\/i><\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n Penalizing women’s fear: intimate partner violence and parental alienation in Canadian child custody cases : <\/b>Professor Elizabeth Sheehy (University of Ottawa)\u00a0 & Professor Susan B. Boyd (University of British Columbia)<\/p>\n ”A close reading of those cases where both alienation and intimate partner violence claims are made reveals troubling patterns in how intimate partner violence is discounted in this context. We suggest that the rise of shared parenting as a dominant norm assists in understanding why alienation has achieved such unquestioned status, and call for greater focus on safety and women’s and children’s voices.”<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n NEW ZEALAND<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n ’It’s Not OK’, but ’It’ never happened: parental alienation accusations undermine children’s safety in the New Zealand Family Court : <\/b>Deborah Mackenzie (The Backbone Collective), Ruth Herbert & Neville Robertson\u00a0<\/p>\n ”While the public campaign slogan in New Zealand when referring to family violence, is ’It’s Not OK’, many women in New Zealand report that the Family Court prefers the catchphrase ’It never happened’. When women and children escaping violence and abuse reach out to the New Zealand Family Court for protection believing the justice system will help them, they often enter an alternative reality where they are not believed and are subsequently made less safe. This is particularly so for those women whose well-founded fears for their children’s safety get reinterpreted as evidence of a deliberate attempt to alienate the children from their fathers.”<\/i><\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n The affective burden of separated mothers in PA(S) inflected custody law systems: a New Zealand case study : <\/b>Professor Vivienne Elizabeth (University of Auckland)<\/p>\n ”Custody law systems across the Anglo-West are increasingly characterised by the overt and covert use of parental alienation (syndrome) as an aid to the governance of post-separation mothers. Difficulties with care arrangements within PA(S) inflected custody law systems are often regarded as evidence of mothers’ alienating behaviours, resulting in a range of remedial, coercive and punitive censures, including losing resident parent status.”<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n ITALY\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Parental alienation (syndrome) in child custody cases: survivors’ experiences and the logic of psychosocial and legal services in Italy : <\/b>Mariachiara Feresin (University of Trieste)<\/p>\n ”Women were often blamed and labelled as ’engaging in parental alienation’ when they were trying to ensure their children’s safety. Children’s accounts were interpreted as being a result of their mothers’ manipulation. In contrast, fathers were treated as victims of vindictive women who want to keep children to themselves. Men’s violent behaviours were not considered, and their role as fathers was seen as ’inviolable’.”<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n SPAIN\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Parental Alienation Syndrome in Spain: opposed by the Government but accepted in the Courts : <\/b>Gloria Casas Vila (University of Lausanne, Switzerland)<\/p>\n ”However, the parallel dissemination of the pseudo-scientific concept of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), especially since 2004, has become a tool to stall the enforcement of gender equality legislation. Specifically, PAS is causing severe harm in legal procedures related to marital breakdown. Both the government and the General Council of the Judiciary have taken a stand against the deployment of PAS in the legal system, but the notion of parental alienation is still widely used in family courts.”\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESEARCH<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n https:\/\/www.rachelwatsonbooks.com\/blog1\/academic-research-parental-alienation<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n\t Allt fler psykologer, psykiater och advokater, liksom de h\u00e4r tre fr\u00e5n Italien, v\u00e4rlden \u00f6ver \u00e4r nu p\u00e5 G att klarl\u00e4gga och opponera sig gentemot den psykiska tortyr som mammor och barn uts\u00e4tts f\u00f6r genom de f\u00f6rvillselser om PA(S) till de familjer\u00e4ttsliga probleml\u00f6sningarna. S\u00e5 varf\u00f6r ska vi h\u00e4r i landet beh\u00f6va finna oss i detta gissel av medeltida h\u00e4xjakt?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/watch\/live\/?v=629449111187957&ref=notif¬if_id=1614099823703436¬if_t=live_video<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t <\/p>\n SVENSKT AVST\u00c5NDSTAGANDE TILL PAS<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n R. A. GARDNERS 8 KRITERIER P\u00c5 UTSATTHET F\u00d6R PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n R.A. GARDNER – CITAT<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n HISTORISK \/ ANTROPOLOGISK \/ MYTOLOGISK \/ RELIGI\u00d6S KONTEXT TILL PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n JU FLER REFORMER – DESTO MER URHOLKAT R\u00c4TTSSKYDD<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n DETEKTERING AV PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n F\u00d6R\u00d6VARSTRATEGIERNA DARVO<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n T\u00c4NK OM –\u00a0T\u00c4NK TV\u00c4RTOM<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n EN TYDLIGG\u00d6RANDE BEGREPPSAPPARAT F\u00d6R ATT ST\u00c4DA UPP I PA(S)-LOBBYISMENS BEGREPPSR\u00d6RA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n ”K\u00d6NSKRIG” – ELLER KAMP F\u00d6R KVINNORS OCH BARNS M\u00c4NSKLIGA R\u00c4TTIGHETER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n ANNIKA REJMER – F\u00c5GEL ELLER FISK?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n FRU JUSTITIAS FAKTARESISTENS = ”OBJEKTIVITET” ? INTERVJU MED ANNA SINGER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n LYTSYS INTERVJU MED LAGMAN MATS SJ\u00d6STEN\u00a0<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n LYTSYS INTERVJU MED BARNL\u00c4KAREN LARS H. GUSTAVSSON<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n JENNIFER HOULTS OMFATTANDE GENOMG\u00c5NG AV PAS-LOBBYISMENS OHEDERLIGA METODER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n M\u00d6DRAR DISKRIMINERAS TILL F\u00d6RM\u00c5N F\u00d6R V\u00c5LDSUT\u00d6VANDE F\u00c4DER\u00a0 MED HJ\u00c4LP AV\u00a0PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n STEFAN WIDELLS BREV 2011 TILL POL. SAKKUNNIG U. LINDGREN OCH HANS \u00a0GODDA YXSKAFT- SVAR<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n STEFAN WIDELLS ARTIKEL OM PAS I GP 2011<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n BRYNGE: L\u00c4S LENA HELLBLOM SJ\u00d6GRENS ARTIKELN SOM EN SAGA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n PROFESSOR SVERKER SIKSTR\u00d6M UPPFINNER HJULET P\u00c5 NYTT<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n LEKTOR LEONARD NGAOSUVAN<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n F D. JURIDIKSTUD. NIKLAS MAGEE MATELUNA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n REGERINGEN AVSV\u00c4R SIG ANSVAR F\u00d6R DOMARK\u00c5RENS KOMPETENSUTVECKLING<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n SAMARBETSSAMTAL OCH MEDLING<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n ULV I F\u00c5RAKL\u00c4DER – ”MEDLAREN” PETER HANTHE<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n BO:s YTTRANDE \u00d6VER 2002 \u00c5RS V\u00c5RDNADSKOMMITT\u00c9<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n MAMMORS BESKYDDARINSTINKT – ETT HOT MOT BARN?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Forskningsrapport av Eva Lundgren, Gun Heimer, Jenny Westerstrand, Anne-Marie Kalliokoski \/\u00a0 n\u00e5gra inledande avsnitt<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Forskningsrapport av Eva Lundgren, Gun Heimer, Jenny Westerstrand, Anne-Marie Kalliokoski\/ sammanfattning & kommentarhttp:\/\/mmstudies.com\/pas\/<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n\t <\/p>\n SVENSKT AVST\u00c5NDSTAGANDE TILL PAS<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n R. A. GARDNERS 8 KRITERIER P\u00c5 UTSATTHET F\u00d6R PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n R.A. GARDNER – CITAT<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n HISTORISK \/ ANTROPOLOGISK \/ MYTOLOGISK \/ RELIGI\u00d6S KONTEXT TILL PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n JU FLER REFORMER – DESTO MER URHOLKAT R\u00c4TTSSKYDD<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n DETEKTERING AV PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n F\u00d6R\u00d6VARSTRATEGIERNA DARVO<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n T\u00c4NK OM –\u00a0T\u00c4NK TV\u00c4RTOM<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n EN TYDLIGG\u00d6RANDE BEGREPPSAPPARAT F\u00d6R ATT ST\u00c4DA UPP I PA(S)-LOBBYISMENS BEGREPPSR\u00d6RA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n ”K\u00d6NSKRIG” – ELLER KAMP F\u00d6R KVINNORS OCH BARNS M\u00c4NSKLIGA R\u00c4TTIGHETER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n ANNIKA REJMER – F\u00c5GEL ELLER FISK?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n FRU JUSTITIAS FAKTARESISTENS = ”OBJEKTIVITET” ? INTERVJU MED ANNA SINGER<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n LYTSYS INTERVJU MED LAGMAN MATS SJ\u00d6STEN\u00a0<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n LYTSYS INTERVJU MED BARNL\u00c4KAREN LARS H. GUSTAVSSON<\/a><\/em><\/p>\nThe Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy,\u00a0<\/a><\/h3>\n
Mer om J.D. Jennifer Hoults mycket omfattande vetenskapsteoretiska analys finns p\u00e5 denna hemsida \u00bb<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
Sammanst\u00e4llningen \u00e4r kopierad fr\u00e5n denna hemsida:<\/h2>\n
Rachel Watson Insight<\/a><\/h2>\n
Summary of Academic Research on Parental Alienation (In Cases Involving Domestic Abuse)<\/a><\/h3>\n
Summary\u00a0<\/h3>\n
It is clear from the academic research that parental alienation, in cases involving domestic abuse, has the purpose and the power to swivel the spotlight from the evidence of abusive behaviour to the allegations of alienating behaviour. The concept of parental alienation in these cases is harmful and results in poor outcomes for domestic abuse victims and children.\u00a0<\/h3>\n
If you have been falsely accused of parental alienation in the family courts, or you have been blamed when all you wish to do is protect your child from abuse, then I can offer you help to ease your worry and stress. I will teach you how to remain calm, how to communicate in court and how to protect your child,<\/i><\/b>HERE<\/i><\/a>\u00a0<\/h3>\n
ITALIENARNA \u00c4R P\u00c5 HUGGET – MEN N\u00c4R SKA \u00a0ANSVARIGA I SVERIGE VAKNA?<\/a><\/h2>\n
L\u00c4NKLISTA:<\/h2>\n
I ) VAD \u00c4R\u00a0 PA(S)?<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
I ) VAD \u00c4R PA(S)mmmm<\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
II ) VETENSKAP ELLER VIDSKEPLIGA F\u00d6RVILLELSER<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
III ) LYTSY \/ BERGENSTEIN: BARN SOM TVINGAS V\u00c4LJA BORT EN F\u00d6R\u00c4LDER<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
IV ) NUTIDA INTERNATIONELL FORSKNING SOM ENH\u00c4LLIGT VEDERL\u00c4GGER PA(S)-KONCEPTET SOM OVETENSKAPLIGT<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
V ) SVENSKA KRITIKER AV PA(S)<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
VI ) NUTIDA SVENSKA PA(S)-LOBBYISTER<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
VII ) GENOMG\u00c5NG AV PRAXIS I SVENSKA DOMSTOLAR G\u00c4LLANDE BROTT – OCH TVISTEM\u00c5L MED GRUND I DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OCH \/ ELLER CHILD ABUSE<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
VIII ) H\u00d6GKVALITATIV SVENSK FORSKNING SOM L\u00c4GGS I BYR\u00c5L\u00c5DORNA<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
L\u00c4NKLISTA:<\/h3>\n
I ) VAD \u00c4R\u00a0 PA(S)?<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
I ) VAD \u00c4R PA(S)mmmm<\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
II ) VETENSKAP ELLER VIDSKEPLIGA F\u00d6RVILLELSER<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
III ) LYTSY \/ BERGENSTEIN: BARN SOM TVINGAS V\u00c4LJA BORT EN F\u00d6R\u00c4LDER<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n
IV ) NUTIDA INTERNATIONELL FORSKNING SOM ENH\u00c4LLIGT VEDERL\u00c4GGER PA(S)-KONCEPTET SOM OVETENSKAPLIGT<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n
mmmm<\/h3>\n